Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: ME migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MS food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.051 habitat: 0jMpe, jiMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.004 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
tj 38 37.15 (0.02227) d time since birth at metam GreeGart1999
am 1278 1281 (0.003013) d life span GreeGart1999
Lp 7.4 7.372 (0.003828) cm standard length fat puberty fishbase
Li 11.5 12.12 (0.05355) cm ultimate standard length for females fishbase
Lim 10.3 11.23 (0.09045) cm ultimate standard length for males fishbase
Wwb 0.00027 0.0002682 (0.00673) g wet weight at birth Wiki
Wwi 20.9 20.25 (0.03091) g ultimate wet weight for females fishbase
Wwim 14.8 15.17 (0.02482) g ultimate wet weight for males fishbase
Ri 19.18 20.2 (0.05309) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, males time since birth standard length (0.08969) GreeGart1999
tL_m Data for females, males time since birth standard length (0.04637) GreeGart1999

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Electrona antarctica Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01686 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 427.1 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.02446 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.801 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.99 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from femlaes by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • Preferred temperature 0.4 C (Ref: fishbase)
  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.01000*(SL in cm)^3.13 (Ref: fishbase)

Acknowledgment

  • The creation of this entry was supported by the Norwegian Science Council (NFR 255295)

Bibliography

Citation