Predictions & Data for this entry
| Model: std | climate: Aw | migrate: | phylum: |
| COMPLETE = 2.5 | ecozone: TN | food: biCi | class: |
| MRE = 0.069 | habitat: 0bTd, biFc | gender: Dg | order: |
| SMSE = 0.015 | embryo: Tt | reprod: O | family: |
Zero-variate data
| Data | Observed | Predicted | (RE) | Unit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ab | 275 | 273.5 | (0.005347) | d | age at birth | arkive |
| tp | 3285 | 3192 | (0.02832) | d | time since birth at puberty for female | MartSouz2008 |
| tpm | 6205 | 6071 | (0.02164) | d | time since birth at puberty for male | MartSouz2008 |
| am | 3.65e+04 | 3.65e+04 | (9.084e-06) | d | life span | MartSouz2008 |
| Lb | 2.85 | 2.87 | (0.007184) | cm | plastron length at birth | NoveSous2008 |
| Lp | 8.8 | 9.652 | (0.0968) | cm | plastron length at puberty for female | MartSouz2008 |
| Lpm | 10.2 | 11.89 | (0.1653) | cm | plastron length at puberty for male | MartSouz2008 |
| Li | 11.8 | 11.7 | (0.008616) | cm | ultimate plastron length for females | MartSouz2008 |
| Lim | 12.6 | 12.52 | (0.006456) | cm | ultimate plastron length for males | MartSouz2008 |
| Wwb | 7.8 | 7.771 | (0.003681) | g | wet weight at birth | NoveSous2008 |
| Wwi | 520 | 526 | (0.01158) | g | ultimate wet weight | MartSouz2008 |
| Ri | 0.008219 | 0.008219 | (3.525e-05) | #/d | maximum reprod rate | arkive |
Uni- and bivariate data
| Data | Figure | Independent variable | Dependent variable | (RE) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LdL_f |   | plastron length | change in plastron length | (0.2534) | MartSouz2008 |
| LdL_m | | plastron length | change in plastron length | (0.126) | MartSouz2008 |
Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C
| Data | Generalised animal | Hydromedusa maximiliani | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v | 0.02 | 0.01558 | cm/d | energy conductance |
| kap | 0.8 | 0.826 | - | allocation fraction to soma |
| kap_R | 0.95 | 0.95 | - | reproduction efficiency |
| p_M | 18 | 12.41 | J/d.cm^3 | vol-spec som maint |
| k_J | 0.002 | 0.0004739 | 1/d | maturity maint rate coefficient |
| kap_G | 0.8 | 0.7988 | - | growth efficiency |
| k | 0.3 | 0.3001 | - | maintenance ratio |
Discussion
- Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hb only
- MartSouz2008 report in their Fig 1 growth rate in mm/yr, but this analysis assumes that it is actually in mm/d
- In view of low somatic maintenance, pseudodata k_J = 0.002 1/d is replaced by pseudodata k = 0.3
Bibliography