Liopholis inornata (Desert Skink):  

Predictions & Data for this entry

Model:  std  

COMPLETE = 2.5
MRE = 0.122
SMSE = 0.126

Zero-variate data
DataObservedPredicted(RE)UnitDescriptionReference
ab120 114.4 (0.04632)dage at birthKearUnpub
ap446 506.6 (0.1359)dage at pubertyKearUnpub
am3650 3650 (3.212e-05)dlife spanChap2003
Lb4.2 3.7 (0.1191)cmtotal length at birthKearUnpub
Lp 6 5.575 (0.07081)cmtotal length at pubertyKearUnpub
Li8.6 9.087 (0.05662)cmultimate total lengthKearUnpub
Wwb1.85 1.882 (0.01706)gwet weight at birthKearUnpub
Wwp7.63 6.438 (0.1562)gwet weight at pubertyKearUnpub
Wwi21.41 27.88 (0.3022)gultimate wet weightKearUnpub
Ri0.01644 0.0147 (0.1056)#/dmaximum reprod ratePian1982
Uni-variate data
DatasetFigure(RE)Independent variableDependent variableReference
TO see Fig. 1 (0.4063)temperatureO2 consumption rateKearUnpub
tW see Fig. 2 (0.1225)ageweightKearUnpub
tL see Fig. 3 (0.0593)agelengthKearUnpub
LW see Fig. 4 (0.1163)snout vent lengthwet weightKearUnpub
Pseudo-data at Tref
DataGeneralised animalLiopholis inornataUnitDescription
v 0.02 0.01796cm/denergy conductance
kap 0.8 0.4551-allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95-reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 14.06J/d.cm^3vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.00030211/dmaturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8113-growth efficiency
k 0.3 0.1662-maintenance ratio

Discussion

  • The T_A is estimated outside of this fitting procedure in a general study of Egernia-group lizards
  • In view of low somatic maintenance, pseudodata k_J = 0.002 1/d is replaced by pseudodata k = 0.3

Bibliography

  • Wiki
  • Kooy2010
  • Chap2003
  • Pian1982
  • KearUnpub

Bibtex files with references for this entry


Michael Kearney, Elia Pirtle, 2017/06/01 (last modified by Bas Kooijman 2017/11/13)

accepted: 2017/11/13

refer to this entry as: AmP Liopholis inornata version 2017/11/13 bio.vu.nl/thb/deb/deblab/add_my_pet/