Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Csa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.4 ecozone: THp food: biCi, jiD class:
MRE = 0.041 habitat: 0iFr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.003 embryo: Fg reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3650 3627 (0.006275) d life span guess
Lp 8.7 8.493 (0.0238) cm fork length at puberty for females HerrFern1994
Lpm 7.6 7.471 (0.01699) cm fork length at puberty for males HerrFern1994
Li 37.04 38.63 (0.04297) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.0018 0.001668 (0.07324) g wet weight at birth HerrFern1994
Wwp 8.4 8.472 (0.008543) g wet weight at puberty HerrFern1994, fishbase
Wwi 773 797.3 (0.03144) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 139.7 134.1 (0.04) #/d Reprod rate max rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for females, mix, males, mix time since birth fork length (0.05177) HerrFern1994
tL Data for females, mix, males, mix time since birth fork length (0.07049) HerrFern1994
tL_m Data for females, mix, males, mix time since birth fork length (0.04806) HerrFern1994
tL1 Data for females, mix, males, mix time since birth fork length (0.07402) HerrFern1994

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Pseudochondrostoma polylepis Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01873 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 23.16 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.4512 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.7775 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.801 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} and E_Hp only
  • Temperatures are guessed
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00776*(TL in cm)^3.12 (Ref: fishbase)
  • fork-total length FL = 0.926*TL, based on photo (Ref: ittiofauna)

Bibliography

Citation