Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MPN, MAN food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.156 habitat: 0iMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.036 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 1.095e+04 1.098e+04 (0.002697) d life span fishbase
Lb 0.6 0.9474 (0.5791) cm length at birth access
Lj 6 6.357 (0.05947) cm length at metam access
Lp 62.5 59.57 (0.04688) cm length at pubert fishbase
Li 130 102.2 (0.2139) cm ultimate total length for females fishbase
Lim 110 86.33 (0.2152) cm ultimate total length for males fishbase
Wwb 0.0335 0.02298 (0.3141) g wet weight at birth access
Wwi 2.32e+04 2.883e+04 (0.2429) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwim 1.35e+04 1.521e+04 (0.1268) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 821.9 673.3 (0.1808) #/d maximum reprod rate fishbase

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_f Data for female, male time since birth total length (0.1213) DwyeTreb2016
tL_m Data for female, male time since birth total length (0.1076) DwyeTreb2016

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Reinhardtius hippoglossoides Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02839 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 96.62 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1081 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.4895 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8008 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed to differ from females by {p_Am} only
  • mod_1: males have equal state variables at b, compared to females

Facts

  • Preferred temperature 6 C; weight W (g) - total length L (cm): 0.00387*L^3.206 (Ref: fishbase)

Acknowledgment

  • The creation of this entry was supported by the Norwegian Science Council (NFR 255295)

Bibliography

Citation