Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfa, Dfa migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THn food: bjTvf, jiPp class:
MRE = 0.075 habitat: 0jFp, jiFr, jiFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.111 embryo: Fbb reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data
DataObservedPredicted(RE)UnitDescriptionReference
ab 14 14.02 (0.001239)dage at birthZaleNeve1982
tp1811 1686 (0.06925)dtime since birth at pubertyJirk1986
am1.898e+04 1.97e+04 (0.03768)dlife spanSansAtki2016
Lb0.0254 0.01574 (0.3803)cmtotal length at birthJirk1986
Lp5.85 5.96 (0.01874)cmtotal length at pubertyJirk1986
Li18.4 18.25 (0.008291)cmultimate total lengthMNDNR
Wwb5.3e-07 6.005e-07 (0.133)gwet weight at birthPate1985
Wwp 33 32.6 (0.01213)gwet weight at pubertyJirk1986
Wwi338 935.7 (1.768)gultimate wet weightHorn2019
Ri4277 4262 (0.003449)#/dmaximum reprod rateMoleLayz2008
Uni-variate data
DatasetFigure(RE)Independent variableDependent variableReference
LW see Fig. 1 (0.08505)total lengthwet weightHorn2019
Pseudo-data at Tref
DataGeneralised animalActinonaias ligamentinaUnitDescription
v 0.02 0.01628cm/denergy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9959-allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95-reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 2.91J/d.cm^3vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.00073261/dmaturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.798-growth efficiency
k 0.6 0.5941-maintenance ratio

Discussion

  • Max weight is ignored because (Li, Wwi) is inconsistent with LW data
  • Pseudo-data k=0.6 is used since [p_M] is very low

Bibliography

Citation