Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB, MC migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MA, MPS, MIS food: bjPz, jiCi, jiCvf class:
MRE = 0.044 habitat: 0jMp, jiMd gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.053 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data
DataObservedPredicted(RE)UnitDescriptionReference
am1.46e+04 1.459e+04 (0.0004321)dlife spanOrloVedi2018
Lp 42 41.97 (0.0007546)cmtotal length at puberty for femalefishbase
Li 75 81.33 (0.0844)cmultimate total lengthfishbase
Wwb0.00027 0.0002701 (0.0002822)gwet weight at birthguess
Ri2466 2527 (0.02474)#/dmax reproduction rateguess
Uni-variate data
DatasetFigure(RE)Independent variableDependent variableReference
tL see Fig. 1 (0.04675)time since birthtotal lengthOrloVedi2018
tW see Fig. 2 (0.1337)time since birthwet weightOrloVedi2018
Pseudo-data at Tref
DataGeneralised animalAntimora rostrataUnitDescription
v 0.02 0.01995cm/denergy conductance
kap 0.8 0.5-allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95-reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 17.83J/d.cm^3vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0021/dmaturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8-growth efficiency

Discussion

  • Temperature guessed on the bases of preferred temerature as given in fishbase
  • vliz reports large females,relative to males, but this is not confirmed by OrloVedi2018; probably due to males becoming less old

Bibliography

Citation