Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Cfb, Dfb migrate: Mp phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi, biHl, biD class:
MRE = 0.287 habitat: 0iFp, 0iFm, 0iFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.288 embryo: Fh reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data
tp1643 1652 (0.005778)dage at puberty for femalesWijm2009
tpm1460 3199 (1.191)dage at puberty for malesWijm2009
am3650 3690 (0.01093)dlife spanWijm2009
Lh0.5 0.2421 (0.5157)cmtotal length at hatchWijm2009
Lb0.725 0.2424 (0.6656)cmtotal length at birthWijm2009
Li 50 42.33 (0.1535)cmultimate total lengthWijm2009
Wb0.00052 0.0006019 (0.1574)gwet weight at birthWijm2009
Ri1370 1265 (0.07624)#/dmax reprod rateWijm2009
Uni-variate data
DatasetFigure(RE)Independent variableDependent variableReference
tL see Fig. 1 (0.117)time since birthtotal lengthWijm2009
tW see Fig. 2 (0.133)time since birthwet weightWijm2009
Tah see Fig. 3 (0.1258)temperatureage at hatchWijm2009
Pseudo-data at Tref
DataGeneralised animalCarassius carassiusUnitDescription
v 0.02 0.05513cm/denergy conductance
kap 0.8 0.9956-allocation fraction to soma
kap_R 0.95 0.95-reproduction efficiency
p_M 18 24.16J/^3vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0021/dmaturity maint rate coefficient
kap_G 0.8 0.8108-growth efficiency


  • Males are assumed to differ from females by E_Hp only
  • The high maintenance, compared to other family members, is probably linked to farming selection, to boost production


Bibtex file with references for this entry

Bas Kooijman, 2017/08/14

accepted: 2017/08/14

refer to this entry as: AmP Carassius carassius version 2017/08/14