Predictions & Data for this entry
|am|| 75 ||107.5 ||(0.4339)||d||life span||CromDood1997|
|Lb||0.03077 ||0.03574 ||(0.1614)||cm||total length at birth||Hamd2014|
|Li||0.238 ||0.2539 ||(0.067)||cm||ultimate total length||Hamd2014|
|Wwb||1.695 ||1.651 ||(0.02575)||mug||wet weight at birth||CromDood1997|
|Wwp||30.52 ||25.89 ||(0.1518)||mug||wet weight at puberty||CromDood1997|
|Wdi|| 87 ||100.7 ||(0.1579)||mug||ultimate dry weight||Hamd2014|
|Wwf1||305 ||487.8 ||(0.5993)||mug||wet weight at birth||Hamd2014|
|Wdf1|| 87 ||82.92 ||(0.04686)||mug||dry weight at birth||Hamd2014|
|Wwf2||226 ||298 ||(0.3186)||mug||wet weight at birth||Hamd2014|
|Wdf2|| 76 ||50.66 ||(0.3334)||mug||dry weight at birth||Hamd2014|
|Wwf3||169 ||169.5 ||(0.002723)||mug||wet weight at birth||Hamd2014|
|Wdf3|| 52 ||28.81 ||(0.446)||mug||dry weight at birth||Hamd2014|
|Ri||19.5 ||20.76 ||(0.06442)||#/d||maximum reprod rate||Hamd2014|
|Uni-variate data |
|Dataset||Figure||(RE)||Independent variable||Dependent variable||Reference|
|tL_f1 ||see Fig. 1 ||(0.08682)||time since birth||length||Hamd2014|
|tL_f2 ||see Fig. 1 ||(0.08965)||time since birth||length||Hamd2014|
|tL_f3 ||see Fig. 1 ||(0.1225)||time since birth||length||Hamd2014|
|tN_f1 ||see Fig. 2 ||(0.2009)||time since birth||cumulative # of eggs||Hamd2014|
|tN_f2 ||see Fig. 2 ||(0.1147)||time since birth||cumulative # of eggs||Hamd2014|
|tN_f3 ||see Fig. 2 ||(0.1925)||time since birth||cumulative # of eggs||Hamd2014|
|tL_T1 ||see Fig. 3 ||(0.09918)||time since birth||length||Hamd2014|
|tL_T2 ||see Fig. 3 ||(0.06304)||time since birth||length||Hamd2014|
|tL_T3 ||see Fig. 3 ||(0.03995)||time since birth||length||Hamd2014|
|tN_T1 ||see Fig. 4 ||(0.2293)||time since birth||cumulative # of eggs||Hamd2014|
|tN_T2 ||see Fig. 4 ||(0.09908)||time since birth||cumulative # of eggs||Hamd2014|
|tN_T3 ||see Fig. 4 ||(28.29)||time since birth||cumulative # of eggs||Hamd2014|
|Tab ||see Fig. 5 ||(0.3571)||temperature||age at birth||Hamd2014|
|WJO ||see Fig. 6 ||(0.325)||wet weight||O_2 consumption||StamLeem1996|
|tW ||see Fig. 7 ||(0.2305)||time since birth||wet weight||CromDood1997|
|tN ||see Fig. 8 ||(0.2177)||time since birth||cum # of eggs||CromDood1997|
| Pseudo-data at Tref|
|Data||Generalised animal||Folsomia candida||Unit||Description|
|v ||0.02 ||0.003881||cm/d||energy conductance|
|kap ||0.8 ||0.2226||-||allocation fraction to soma|
|kap_R ||0.95 ||0.95||-||reproduction efficiency|
|p_M || 18 ||845.6||J/d.cm^3||vol-spec som maint|
|k_J ||0.002 ||0.002||1/d||maturity maint rate coefficient|
|kap_G ||0.8 ||0.8244||-||growth efficiency|
A laboratory culture of F. candida was used for these experiments, which has been kept for more than 10 years at the Institute of Environmental Sciences of Jagiellonian University, Poland. The animals were maintained as stock cultures in plastic boxes filled with moist plaster of paris, mixed with charcoal, at a constant temperature of 20C, and with dried baker's yeast (Dr. Oetker) as food. Prior to the experiments, adult animals were transferred to a plastic boxes (10 cm in diameter) with plastic screw top lids, and filled with moist plaster of paris to lay eggs. After 7 days, the adults were removed and the eggs were allowed to hatch. Emerging juveniles of age between 1 and 3 days were used in the experiments. Two sets of experiments were designed. EXPERIMENT 1: growth and reproduction of individuals was observed at three feeding conditions. EXPERIMENT 2: growth and reproduction of individuals observed at three different temperatures with ad libitum food. Both experiments were carried out in plastic containers (3. 5 cm in diameter) with plastic screw top lids. 1--3 days old juveniles were individually kept in plastic vessels (diameter 3.5 cm) filled with moist plaster of paris at three feeding regimes. Baker's yeast solution (0.2 g/ml) was used as food source. Body lengths (i.e. the distance from the posterior end of the abdomen to the anterior end of the head between the antennae) were determined using the free image analysis software ImageJ (v.1.47p); (National Institute of Health, USA, http://imagej.nih.gov).EXPERIMENT 1: Growth and Reproduction at three food regimes. In the highest food regime, food was supplied ad libitum. In the medium food regime, the yeast solution was available for 24 hours, followed by 48 hours without food. In the lowest food regime, the yeast solution was available for 24 hours, followed by 96 hours without food. EXPERIMENT 2: three constant temperature
Egg production at treatment T3 did not follow the expected pattern for unknown reasons
Respiration is overestimated; this might suggest product formation coupled to maintenance
T. Crommentuijn, C. J. A. M. Doodeman, A. Doornekamp, and C. A. M. Van Gestel.
Life-table study with the springtail Folsomia candida
(Willem) exposed to cadmium, chlorpyrifos and triphenyltin hydroxide.
In N. M. Van Straalen and H. Løkke, editors, Ecological risk
assessment of contaminants in soil, pages 275--291. Chapman & Hall, London,
M. T. Fountain and S. P. Hopkin.
Folsomia candida (Collembola): A "standard" soil
Annual Review of Entomology, 50:201--222, 2005.
N. T. Hamda.
Mechanistic models to explore combined effects of toxic
chemicals and natural stressing factors: case study on springtails.
PhD thesis, VU University, Amsterdam, 2014.
Dynamic Energy Budget theory for metabolic organisation.
Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2010.
E. M. Stam, M.A. van de Leemkule, and G. Ernsting.
Trade-offs in the life history and energy budget of the
parthenogenetic collembolan Folsomia candida (Willem).
Oecologia, 107(3):283--292, 1996.
Bibtex file with references for this entry
Natanael T. Hamda, 2013/03/21 (last modified by Bas Kooijman
refer to this entry as: AmP Folsomia candida version 2016/02/09 bio.vu.nl/thb/deb/deblab/add_my_pet/