Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MB, MC migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.3 ecozone: MC food: biPz class:
MRE = 0.056 habitat: 0jMpe, jiMp gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Mpe reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3285 3292 (0.002069) d life span guess
Lp 8 8.13 (0.01625) cm standard length fat puberty guess
Li 16 16.9 (0.05638) cm ultimate standard length fishbase
Wwb 1.4e-05 1.407e-05 (0.004984) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 3.4 3.397 (0.0007951) g wet weight at puberty guess, fishbase
Wwi 30.6 30.53 (0.002369) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Ri 416.4 417.3 (0.002067) #/d max reprod rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL time since birth standard length (0.1074) KawaMauc1982

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lampanyctus macdonaldi Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02569 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 67.39 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.1548 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8023 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ from females
  • scaled functional response for tL data is high, but measured length exceeds L_m

Facts

  • Length-Weight relationship: W in g = 0.00479*(TL in cm)^3.16 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation