Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: Dwb migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: THp food: biCi class:
MRE = 0.038 habitat: 0iFl gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.002 embryo: Fnm reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
am 3650 3643 (0.002041) d life span Weis1962
Lp 5.8 5.187 (0.1057) cm total length at puberty for females guess
Li 14 12.98 (0.0729) cm ultimate total length for females fishbase
Wwb 0.0023 0.002305 (0.002012) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 1.9 1.957 (0.03018) g wet weight at puberty for females fishbase, guess
Wwi 30 30.67 (0.02231) g ultimate wet weight for females fishbase
Ri 3.288 3.458 (0.05173) #/d reproduction rate guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tLW time since birth total length
weight
(0.03946) TolmDzyu2009

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Leocottus kesslerii Unit Description
v 0.02 0.02166 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 106.8 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.09793 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.9 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.8003 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • Males are assumed not to differ from females, but males are larger than females (no data)

Facts

  • length-weight: Ww in g = 0.00794*(TL in cm)^3.12 (Ref: fishbase)
  • Lake Baikal and small lakes in its basins; lower Selenge, Angara and Baingol rivers (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation