Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: Mo phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MASE food: biCi, jiHa class:
MRE = 0.063 habitat: 0iMp, jiMr gender: Hsm order:
SMSE = 0.009 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 10 4.955 (0.5045) d age at birth guess
am 1.825e+04 1.831e+04 (0.003222) d life span fishbase
Lp 46.4 44.67 (0.03726) cm total length at puberty fishbase
Li 100 97.57 (0.02428) cm ultimate total length fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003168 (0.009907) g wet weight at birth fishbase
Wwp 1832 1835 (0.001367) g wet weight at puberty fishbase
Wwi 1.906e+04 1.912e+04 (0.002989) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.05 0.04946 (0.01082) g/g gonado-somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
tL_N Data for northern, southern population time since birth fork length (0.1035) HoltKirc2001
tL_S Data for northern, southern population time since birth fork length (0.09246) HoltKirc2001

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lithognathus aureti Unit Description
v 0.02 0.01856 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 12.74 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.002 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.8225 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.8932 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7988 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are assumed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01514*(TL in cm)^3.05 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation