Predictions & Data for this entry

Model: abj climate: MA migrate: phylum:
COMPLETE = 2.5 ecozone: MAW food: bjPz, jiCi class:
MRE = 0.060 habitat: 0jMp, jiMr gender: D order:
SMSE = 0.006 embryo: Mp reprod: O family:

Zero-variate data

Data Observed Predicted (RE) Unit Description Reference
ab 3 3.354 (0.1179) d age at birth guess
am 1.204e+04 1.187e+04 (0.01428) d life span fishbase
Lp 32.4 28.77 (0.1122) cm fork length at puberty for females fishbase
Li 128 128.7 (0.005329) cm ultimate fork length fishbase
Wwb 0.00032 0.0003096 (0.03245) g wet weight at birth guess
Wwp 464 484.6 (0.04439) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
Wwi 2.745e+04 4.338e+04 (0.5804) g ultimate wet weight fishbase
GSI 0.14 0.1402 (0.001587) g/g gonado somatic index guess

Uni- and bivariate data

Data Figure Independent variable Dependent variable (RE) Reference
LW fork length weight (0.1762) FerrReze2004
tL time since birth fork length (0.05904) FerrReze2004

Pseudo-data at Tref = 20°C

Data Generalised animal Lutjanus jocu Unit Description
v 0.02 0.0276 cm/d energy conductance
p_M 18 9.862 J/d.cm^3 vol-spec som maint
k_J 0.002 0.0005739 1/d maturity maint rate coefficient
k 0.3 0.3053 - maintenance ratio
kap 0.8 0.729 - allocation fraction to soma
kap_G 0.8 0.7975 - growth efficiency
kap_R 0.95 0.95 - reproduction efficiency

Discussion

  • males are supposed not to differ from females

Facts

  • weight-length relationship: Ww in g = 0.01514*(TL in cm)^2.97 (Ref: fishbase)

Bibliography

Citation